Enum V3ObservationValue
- All Implemented Interfaces:
Serializable,Comparable<V3ObservationValue>
-
Enum Constant Summary
Enum ConstantsEnum ConstantDescriptionCodes specify the category of observation, evidence, or document used to assess for services, e.g., discharge planning, or to establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program.Code specifying financial indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program; e.g., pay stub; tax or income document; asset document; living expenses.Indicates the result of a particular allergy test.AnnotationValueDescription:Used in a patient care message to value simple clinical (non-lab) observations.Observation values that communicate the method used in a quality measure to combine the component measure results included in an composite measure.Description:Coded observation values for types of covered parties under a policy or program based on their personal relationships or employment status.Description:Coded observation values for coverage limitations, for e.g., types of claims or types of parties covered under a policy or program.A clinical judgment as to the worst case result of a future exposure (including substance administration).Description: The domain contains genetic analysis specific observation values, e.g.Indicates the specific observation result which is the reason for the action (prescription, lab test, etc.).This domain is established as a parent to a variety of value domains being defined to support the communication of Individual Case Safety Reports to regulatory bodies.Observation values used to indicate the type of scoring (e.g.Observation values used to indicate what kind of health quality measure is used.Observation values used to assert various populations that a subject falls into.PartialCompletionScaleAbstract security metadata observation values used to indicate mechanism used for authorized alteration of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability)Abstract security observation values used to indicate data integrity metadata.Abstract security observation value used to indicate integrity confidence metadata.Abstract security observation values used to indicate security integrity metadata.Abstract security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate the entity that asserted an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability).Abstract security metadata observation value used to indicate the provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability).Abstract security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate the entity that reported the resource (data, information object, service, or system capability).Observation values used to indicate security observation metadata.Potential values for observations of severity.Contains codes for defining the observed, physical position of a subject, such as during an observation, assessment, collection of a specimen, etc.Values for observations of verification act results Examples: Verified, not verified, verified with warning.Description:Patient exhibits no reaction to the challenge agent.Description:Patient exhibits a minimal reaction to the challenge agent.Description:Patient exhibits a mild reaction to the challenge agent.Description:Patient exhibits moderate reaction to the challenge agent.Description:Patient exhibits a severe reaction to the challenge agent.Security metadata observation values used to indicate the use of a more abstract version of the content, e.g., replacing exact value of an age or date field with a range, or remove the left digits of a credit card number or SSN.Indication of abuse victim.Definition: Coverage is in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s).Definition: Coverage is in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s) - Pending InvestigationDescription:Child over an age as specified by coverage policy or program, e.g., student, differently abled, and income dependent.Indicator of adoption.Security metadata observation values used to indicate the use of an algorithmic combination of actual values with the result of an aggregate function, e.g., average, sum, or count in order to limit disclosure of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) to the minimum necessary.Code specifying that the measure uses all-or-nothing scoring.Living alone.Indicator of annuity ownership or status as beneficiary.Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) by used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems can strip portions of the resource that could allow the identification of the source of the information or the information subject.Codes specifying asset indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program.Indicator of birth.Indicator of creditable coverage.Description:Dependent biological, adopted, foster child as specified by coverage policy or program.Indicator of child support payments received or provided.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a clinician.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a clinician.Indicator of clothing expenses.A measure in which either short-term cross-section or long-term longitudinal analysis is performed over a group of subjects defined by a set of common properties or defining characteristics (e.g., Male smokers between the ages of 40 and 50 years, exposure to treatment, exposure duration).A measure that is composed from one or more other measures and indicates an overall summary of those measures.A measure score in which each individual value for the measure can fall anywhere along a continuous scale (e.g., mean time to thrombolytics which aggregates the time in minutes from a case presenting with chest pain to the time of administration of thrombolytics).Worst case result of a future exposure is assessed to be life-threatening or having high potential for organ system failure.Worst case result of a future exposure is not assessed to be life-threatening or having high potential for organ system failure.Unable to assess the worst case result of a future exposure.Security metadata observation value used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems can establish that data was not modified in transit.Patients who should be removed from the eMeasure population and denominator before determining if numerator criteria are met.Denominator exceptions are those conditions that should remove a patient, procedure or unit of measurement from the denominator only if the numerator criteria are not met.It can be the same as the initial patient population or a subset of the initial patient population to further constrain the population for the purpose of the eMeasure.Description:Person requiring functional and/or financial assistance from another person as specified by coverage policy or program.Living with one or more dependent children requiring moderate supervision.Living with disabled spouse requiring functional and health care assistanceLiving with one or more dependent children requiring intensive supervisionSecurity provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a device.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a device.Security metadata observation value used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems use digital signature to establish that data has not been modified.Indicator of disability income replacement payment.Indication of disability.Description:Persons registered as a family unit in a domestic partner registry as specified by law and by coverage policy or program.Indicator of driving status.Indication of drug use.Description:An individual employed by an employer who receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece-rates, or pay-in-kind through the employeraTMs payment system (i.e., not a contractor) as specified by coverage policy or program.A measure related to the efficiency of medical treatment.Definition: Coverage is in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s).Code specifying eligibility indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program eligibility status, e.g., certificates of creditable coverage; student enrollment; adoption, marriage or birth certificate.A measure related to the level of patient engagement or patient experience of care.Living with family.Description:As specified by coverage policy or program.Indicator of transportation expenses.Indicator of foster child status.Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 81-99% completionIndicates the condition may be life-threatening or has the potential to cause permanent injury.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a healthcare professional.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a healthcare professional.Indicator of health expenses; including medication costs, health service costs, financial participations, and health coverage premiums.Code specifying non-clinical indicators related to health status used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program, e.g., pregnancy, disability, drug use, mental health issues.Indication of status as homeless.Description: An individual having different alleles at one or more loci regarding a specific characterIndicator of housing expense, e.g., household appliances, fixtures, furnishings, and maintenance and repairs.Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be very high.Indication of status as illegal immigrant.Definition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s).Indication of status as incarcerated.Code specifying income indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program; e.g., pay or pension check, child support payments received or provided, and taxes paid.Description:Person as specified by coverage policy or program.Definition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s) - Pending Investigation.Definition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s) - Pending Eligibility Update.Indicator of investment income, e.g., dividend check, annuity payment; real estate rent, investment divestiture proceeds; trust or endowment check.The initial population refers to all entities to be evaluated by a specific quality measure who share a common set of specified characteristics within a specific measurement set to which a given measure belongs.The initial patient population refers to all patients to be evaluated by a specific quality measure who share a common set of specified characteristics within a specific measurement set to which a given measure belongs.Indication of IV drug use .Indicates the condition may result in some adverse consequences but is unlikely to substantially affect the situation of the subject.Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 61-80% completionIndicator of legal expenses.Code specifying that the measure uses linear scoring.Code specifying observations related to living dependency, such as dependent upon spouse for activities of daily living.Codes specifying living expense indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program.Code specifying observations related to living situation for a person in a private residence.Lying on the left side.The value assigned as the indicator of the digital quality or reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator.Indicator of low digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator.Indicator of basic digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator.Indicator of medium digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of verification and validation of the process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator.Indicator of high digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator.The value assigned as the indicator of the digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier.Indicator of the low digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier.Indicator of the basic digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier.Indicator of the medium digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier.Indicator of the high digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier.The value assigned as the indicator of the high quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber.Indicator of the low quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber.Indicator of the basic quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber.Indicator of the medium quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber.Indicator of the high quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber.Indicator of the digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and its binding to an identity.Indicator of the low digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and its binding to an identity.Indicator of the basic digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and its binding to an identity.Indicator of the medium digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and itâ??s binding to an identity.Indicator of the high digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and itâ??s binding to an identity.Indicator of the quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be.Indicator of low digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be.Indicator of some digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that that an individual is who he or she claims to be.Indicator of high digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be.Indicator of high digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be.Indicator of the digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin.Indicator of low digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin.Indicator of basic digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin.Indicator of medium digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin.Indicator of high digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin.Indicator of the digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls.Indicator of low digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls.Indicator of basic digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls.Indicator of medium digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls.Indicator of high digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organization's security controls.Indicator of the digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication.Indicator of the low digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication.Indicator of the basic digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication.Indicator of the medium digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication.Indicator of the high digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication.Indicates the condition may result in noticable adverse adverse consequences but is unlikely to be life-threatening or cause permanent injury.Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the IT resource semantic content has been transformed from one encoding to another.Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) by indicating the mechanism by which software systems can make data unintelligible (that is, as unreadable and unusable by algorithmically transforming plaintext into ciphertext) such that it can only be accessed or used by authorized users.Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 41-60% completionIndicator of status as covered member under a policy or program, e.g., member id card or coverage document.Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 1-20% completionIndicator of military status.Indicator of mortgage amount, interest, and payments.Indicator of marriage status.Measure population is used only in continuous variable eMeasures.Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 0% completionDefinition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s).added to help the parsersNumerators are used in proportion and ratio eMeasures.Numerator Exclusions are used only in ratio eMeasures to define instances that should not be included in the numerator data.Code specifying that the measure uses opportunity-based scoring.A measure that indicates the result of the performance (or non-performance) of a function or process.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a patient acquaintance.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a patient acquaintance.Indicator of citizenship.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a patient.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a patient.Indicator of paid employment, e.g., letter of hire, contract, employer letter; copy of pay check or pay stub.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a payer.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a payer.Non-clinical report of pregnancy.Lying with the front or ventral surface downward; lying face down.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a professional.Indication of probation status.A measure which focuses on a process which leads to a certain outcome, meaning that a scientific basis exists for believing that the process, when executed well, will increase the probability of achieving a desired outcome.Indicator of real property ownership, e.g., deed or real estate contract.A score derived by dividing the number of cases that meet a criterion for quality (the numerator) by the number of eligible cases within a given time frame (the denominator) where the numerator cases are a subset of the denominator cases (e.g., percentage of eligible women with a mammogram performed in the last year).Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a professional.Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), by indicating the mechanism by which software systems can strip portions of the resource that could allow the identification of the source of the information or the information subject.A score that may have a value of zero or greater that is derived by dividing a count of one type of data by a count of another type of data (e.g., the number of patients with central lines who develop infection divided by the number of central line days).Security metadata observation value used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems can filter an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) to remove any portion of the resource that is not authorized to be access, used, or disclosed.Indication of refugee status.Living with one or more relatives.Continued living in private residence requires functional and health care assistance from one or more relatives.Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be adequate.Indicator of rental or lease payments.A measure related to the extent of use of clinical resources or cost of care.Indicator of retirement investment account ownership.Indicator of retirement payment, e.g., pension check.Lying on the right side.Lying on the back, on an inclined plane, typically about 30-45 degrees with head raised and feet lowered.Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 21-40% completionSecurity provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a substitute decision maker.Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a substitute decision maker.Observation value used to indicate aspects of trust applicable to an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability).A semi-sitting position in bed with the head of the bed elevated approximately 45 degrees.Resting the body on the buttocks, typically with upper torso erect or semi erect.Code specifying observations or indicators related to socio-economic status used to assess to assess for services, e.g., discharge planning, or to establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program.Indicator of spousal or partner support payments received or provided; e.g., alimony payment; support stipulations in a divorce settlement.Living only with spouse or life partner.Continued living in private residence requires functional and health care assistance from spouse or life partner.Description:A pair of people of the same gender who live together as a family as specified by coverage policy or program, e.g., Naomi and Ruth from the Book of Ruth; Socrates and AlcibiadesTo be stationary, upright, vertical, on one's legs.A measure related to the structure of patient care.Indicator of student status.Metadata observation used to indicate that some information has been removed from the source object when the view this object contains was constructed because of configuration options when the view was created.Indicator of transportation expenses.supineIndicator of income supplement, e.g., gifting, parental income support; stipend, or grant.Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the IT resource syntax has been transformed from one syntactical representation to another.Indicator of tax obligation or payment, e.g., statement of taxable income.Indicator of transportation expenses, e.g., vehicle payments, vehicle insurance, vehicle fuel, and vehicle maintenance and repairs.Lying on the back, on an inclined plane, typically about 30-45 degrees, with head lowered and feet raised.Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the IT resource has been translated from one human language to another.Values for security trust accreditation metadata observation made about the formal declaration by an authority or neutral third party that validates the technical, security, trust, and business practice conformance of Trust Agents to facilitate security, interoperability, and trust among participants within a security domain or trust framework.Values for security trust agreement metadata observation made about privacy and security requirements with which a security domain must comply.Values for security trust certificate metadata observation made about a set of security-relevant data issued by a security authority or trusted third party, together with security information which is used to provide the integrity and data origin authentication services for an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability).Values for security trust assurance metadata observation made about the digital quality or reliability of a trust assertion, activity, capability, information exchange, mechanism, process, or protocol.Values for security trust mechanism metadata observation made about a security architecture system component that supports enforcement of security policies.Indicator of status as trust beneficiary.Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be uncertain.Indication of unemployed status.Living with one or more unrelated persons.Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be inadequate.Continued living in private residence requires functional and health care assistance from one or more unrelated persons.Indicator of transportation expenses.Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) which indicates that the resource only retains versions of an IT resource for access and use per applicable policy Usage Note: When this code is used, expectation is that the system has removed historical versions of the data that falls outside the time period deemed to be the effective time of the applicable version.Code specifying that the measure uses weighted scoring. -
Method Summary
Modifier and TypeMethodDescriptionstatic V3ObservationValuetoCode()static V3ObservationValueReturns the enum constant of this type with the specified name.static V3ObservationValue[]values()Returns an array containing the constants of this enum type, in the order they are declared.
-
Enum Constant Details
-
_ACTCOVERAGEASSESSMENTOBSERVATIONVALUE
Codes specify the category of observation, evidence, or document used to assess for services, e.g., discharge planning, or to establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program. The type of evidence is coded as observation values. -
_ACTFINANCIALSTATUSOBSERVATIONVALUE
Code specifying financial indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program; e.g., pay stub; tax or income document; asset document; living expenses. -
ASSET
Codes specifying asset indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program. -
ANNUITY
Indicator of annuity ownership or status as beneficiary. -
PROP
Indicator of real property ownership, e.g., deed or real estate contract. -
RETACCT
Indicator of retirement investment account ownership. -
TRUST
Indicator of status as trust beneficiary. -
INCOME
Code specifying income indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program; e.g., pay or pension check, child support payments received or provided, and taxes paid. -
CHILD
Indicator of child support payments received or provided. -
DISABL
Indicator of disability income replacement payment. -
INVEST
Indicator of investment income, e.g., dividend check, annuity payment; real estate rent, investment divestiture proceeds; trust or endowment check. -
PAY
Indicator of paid employment, e.g., letter of hire, contract, employer letter; copy of pay check or pay stub. -
RETIRE
Indicator of retirement payment, e.g., pension check. -
SPOUSAL
Indicator of spousal or partner support payments received or provided; e.g., alimony payment; support stipulations in a divorce settlement. -
SUPPLE
Indicator of income supplement, e.g., gifting, parental income support; stipend, or grant. -
TAX
Indicator of tax obligation or payment, e.g., statement of taxable income. -
LIVEXP
Codes specifying living expense indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program. -
CLOTH
Indicator of clothing expenses. -
FOOD
Indicator of transportation expenses. -
HEALTH
Indicator of health expenses; including medication costs, health service costs, financial participations, and health coverage premiums. -
HOUSE
Indicator of housing expense, e.g., household appliances, fixtures, furnishings, and maintenance and repairs. -
LEGAL
Indicator of legal expenses. -
MORTG
Indicator of mortgage amount, interest, and payments. -
RENT
Indicator of rental or lease payments. -
SUNDRY
Indicator of transportation expenses. -
TRANS
Indicator of transportation expenses, e.g., vehicle payments, vehicle insurance, vehicle fuel, and vehicle maintenance and repairs. -
UTIL
Indicator of transportation expenses. -
ELSTAT
Code specifying eligibility indicators used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program eligibility status, e.g., certificates of creditable coverage; student enrollment; adoption, marriage or birth certificate. -
ADOPT
Indicator of adoption. -
BTHCERT
Indicator of birth. -
CCOC
Indicator of creditable coverage. -
DRLIC
Indicator of driving status. -
FOSTER
Indicator of foster child status. -
MEMBER
Indicator of status as covered member under a policy or program, e.g., member id card or coverage document. -
MIL
Indicator of military status. -
MRGCERT
Indicator of marriage status. -
PASSPORT
Indicator of citizenship. -
STUDENRL
Indicator of student status. -
HLSTAT
Code specifying non-clinical indicators related to health status used to assess or establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program, e.g., pregnancy, disability, drug use, mental health issues. -
DISABLE
Indication of disability. -
DRUG
Indication of drug use. -
IVDRG
Indication of IV drug use . -
PGNT
Non-clinical report of pregnancy. -
LIVDEP
Code specifying observations related to living dependency, such as dependent upon spouse for activities of daily living. -
RELDEP
Continued living in private residence requires functional and health care assistance from one or more relatives. -
SPSDEP
Continued living in private residence requires functional and health care assistance from spouse or life partner. -
URELDEP
Continued living in private residence requires functional and health care assistance from one or more unrelated persons. -
LIVSIT
Code specifying observations related to living situation for a person in a private residence. -
ALONE
Living alone. Maps to PD1-2 Living arrangement (IS) 00742 [A] -
DEPCHD
Living with one or more dependent children requiring moderate supervision. -
DEPSPS
Living with disabled spouse requiring functional and health care assistance -
DEPYGCHD
Living with one or more dependent children requiring intensive supervision -
FAM
Living with family. Maps to PD1-2 Living arrangement (IS) 00742 [F] -
RELAT
Living with one or more relatives. Maps to PD1-2 Living arrangement (IS) 00742 [R] -
SPS
Living only with spouse or life partner. Maps to PD1-2 Living arrangement (IS) 00742 [S] -
UNREL
Living with one or more unrelated persons. -
SOECSTAT
Code specifying observations or indicators related to socio-economic status used to assess to assess for services, e.g., discharge planning, or to establish eligibility for coverage under a policy or program. -
ABUSE
Indication of abuse victim. -
HMLESS
Indication of status as homeless. -
ILGIM
Indication of status as illegal immigrant. -
INCAR
Indication of status as incarcerated. -
PROB
Indication of probation status. -
REFUG
Indication of refugee status. -
UNEMPL
Indication of unemployed status. -
_ALLERGYTESTVALUE
Indicates the result of a particular allergy test. E.g. Negative, Mild, Moderate, Severe -
A0
Description:Patient exhibits no reaction to the challenge agent. -
A1
Description:Patient exhibits a minimal reaction to the challenge agent. -
A2
Description:Patient exhibits a mild reaction to the challenge agent. -
A3
Description:Patient exhibits moderate reaction to the challenge agent. -
A4
Description:Patient exhibits a severe reaction to the challenge agent. -
_COMPOSITEMEASURESCORING
Observation values that communicate the method used in a quality measure to combine the component measure results included in an composite measure. -
ALLORNONESCR
Code specifying that the measure uses all-or-nothing scoring. All-or-nothing scoring places an individual in the numerator of the composite measure if and only if they are in the numerator of all component measures in which they are in the denominator. -
LINEARSCR
Code specifying that the measure uses linear scoring. Linear scoring computes the fraction of component measures in which the individual appears in the numerator, giving equal weight to each component measure. -
OPPORSCR
Code specifying that the measure uses opportunity-based scoring. In opportunity-based scoring the measure score is determined by combining the denominator and numerator of each component measure to determine an overall composite score. -
WEIGHTSCR
Code specifying that the measure uses weighted scoring. Weighted scoring assigns a factor to each component measure to weight that measure's contribution to the overall score. -
_COVERAGELIMITOBSERVATIONVALUE
Description:Coded observation values for coverage limitations, for e.g., types of claims or types of parties covered under a policy or program. -
_COVERAGELEVELOBSERVATIONVALUE
Description:Coded observation values for types of covered parties under a policy or program based on their personal relationships or employment status. -
ADC
Description:Child over an age as specified by coverage policy or program, e.g., student, differently abled, and income dependent. -
CHD
Description:Dependent biological, adopted, foster child as specified by coverage policy or program. -
DEP
Description:Person requiring functional and/or financial assistance from another person as specified by coverage policy or program. -
DP
Description:Persons registered as a family unit in a domestic partner registry as specified by law and by coverage policy or program. -
ECH
Description:An individual employed by an employer who receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece-rates, or pay-in-kind through the employeraTMs payment system (i.e., not a contractor) as specified by coverage policy or program. -
FLY
Description:As specified by coverage policy or program. -
IND
Description:Person as specified by coverage policy or program. -
SSP
Description:A pair of people of the same gender who live together as a family as specified by coverage policy or program, e.g., Naomi and Ruth from the Book of Ruth; Socrates and Alcibiades -
_CRITICALITYOBSERVATIONVALUE
A clinical judgment as to the worst case result of a future exposure (including substance administration). When the worst case result is assessed to have a life-threatening or organ system threatening potential, it is considered to be of high criticality. -
CRITH
Worst case result of a future exposure is assessed to be life-threatening or having high potential for organ system failure. -
CRITL
Worst case result of a future exposure is not assessed to be life-threatening or having high potential for organ system failure. -
CRITU
Unable to assess the worst case result of a future exposure. -
_GENETICOBSERVATIONVALUE
Description: The domain contains genetic analysis specific observation values, e.g. Homozygote, Heterozygote, etc. -
HOMOZYGOTE
Description: An individual having different alleles at one or more loci regarding a specific character -
_OBSERVATIONMEASURESCORING
Observation values used to indicate the type of scoring (e.g. proportion, ratio) used by a health quality measure. -
COHORT
A measure in which either short-term cross-section or long-term longitudinal analysis is performed over a group of subjects defined by a set of common properties or defining characteristics (e.g., Male smokers between the ages of 40 and 50 years, exposure to treatment, exposure duration). -
CONTVAR
A measure score in which each individual value for the measure can fall anywhere along a continuous scale (e.g., mean time to thrombolytics which aggregates the time in minutes from a case presenting with chest pain to the time of administration of thrombolytics). -
PROPOR
A score derived by dividing the number of cases that meet a criterion for quality (the numerator) by the number of eligible cases within a given time frame (the denominator) where the numerator cases are a subset of the denominator cases (e.g., percentage of eligible women with a mammogram performed in the last year). -
RATIO
A score that may have a value of zero or greater that is derived by dividing a count of one type of data by a count of another type of data (e.g., the number of patients with central lines who develop infection divided by the number of central line days). -
_OBSERVATIONMEASURETYPE
Observation values used to indicate what kind of health quality measure is used. -
COMPOSITE
A measure that is composed from one or more other measures and indicates an overall summary of those measures. -
EFFICIENCY
A measure related to the efficiency of medical treatment. -
EXPERIENCE
A measure related to the level of patient engagement or patient experience of care. -
OUTCOME
A measure that indicates the result of the performance (or non-performance) of a function or process. -
PROCESS
A measure which focuses on a process which leads to a certain outcome, meaning that a scientific basis exists for believing that the process, when executed well, will increase the probability of achieving a desired outcome. -
RESOURCE
A measure related to the extent of use of clinical resources or cost of care. -
STRUCTURE
A measure related to the structure of patient care. -
_OBSERVATIONPOPULATIONINCLUSION
Observation values used to assert various populations that a subject falls into. -
DENEX
Patients who should be removed from the eMeasure population and denominator before determining if numerator criteria are met. Denominator exclusions are used in proportion and ratio measures to help narrow the denominator. -
DENEXCEP
Denominator exceptions are those conditions that should remove a patient, procedure or unit of measurement from the denominator only if the numerator criteria are not met. Denominator exceptions allow for adjustment of the calculated score for those providers with higher risk populations. Denominator exceptions are used only in proportion eMeasures. They are not appropriate for ratio or continuous variable eMeasures. Denominator exceptions allow for the exercise of clinical judgment and should be specifically defined where capturing the information in a structured manner fits the clinical workflow. Generic denominator exception reasons used in proportion eMeasures fall into three general categories: Medical reasons Patient reasons System reasons -
DENOM
It can be the same as the initial patient population or a subset of the initial patient population to further constrain the population for the purpose of the eMeasure. Different measures within an eMeasure set may have different Denominators. Continuous Variable eMeasures do not have a Denominator, but instead define a Measure Population. -
IP
The initial population refers to all entities to be evaluated by a specific quality measure who share a common set of specified characteristics within a specific measurement set to which a given measure belongs. -
IPP
The initial patient population refers to all patients to be evaluated by a specific quality measure who share a common set of specified characteristics within a specific measurement set to which a given measure belongs. Details often include information based upon specific age groups, diagnoses, diagnostic and procedure codes, and enrollment periods. -
MSRPOPL
Measure population is used only in continuous variable eMeasures. It is a narrative description of the eMeasure population. (e.g., all patients seen in the Emergency Department during the measurement period). -
NUMER
Numerators are used in proportion and ratio eMeasures. In proportion measures the numerator criteria are the processes or outcomes expected for each patient, procedure, or other unit of measurement defined in the denominator. In ratio measures the numerator is related, but not directly derived from the denominator (e.g., a numerator listing the number of central line blood stream infections and a denominator indicating the days per thousand of central line usage in a specific time period). -
NUMEX
Numerator Exclusions are used only in ratio eMeasures to define instances that should not be included in the numerator data. (e.g., if the number of central line blood stream infections per 1000 catheter days were to exclude infections with a specific bacterium, that bacterium would be listed as a numerator exclusion.) -
_PARTIALCOMPLETIONSCALE
PartialCompletionScale -
G
Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 81-99% completion -
LE
Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 61-80% completion -
ME
Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 41-60% completion -
MI
Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 1-20% completion -
N
Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 0% completion -
S
Value for Act.partialCompletionCode attribute that implies 21-40% completion -
_SECURITYOBSERVATIONVALUE
Observation values used to indicate security observation metadata. -
_SECINTOBV
Abstract security observation values used to indicate security integrity metadata. Examples: Codes conveying integrity status, integrity confidence, and provenance. -
_SECALTINTOBV
Abstract security metadata observation values used to indicate mechanism used for authorized alteration of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) -
ABSTRED
Security metadata observation values used to indicate the use of a more abstract version of the content, e.g., replacing exact value of an age or date field with a range, or remove the left digits of a credit card number or SSN. -
AGGRED
Security metadata observation values used to indicate the use of an algorithmic combination of actual values with the result of an aggregate function, e.g., average, sum, or count in order to limit disclosure of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) to the minimum necessary. -
ANONYED
Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) by used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems can strip portions of the resource that could allow the identification of the source of the information or the information subject. No key to relink the data is retained. -
MAPPED
Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the IT resource semantic content has been transformed from one encoding to another. Usage Note: "MAP" code does not indicate the semantic fidelity of the transformed content. To indicate semantic fidelity for maps of HL7 to other code systems, this security alteration integrity observation may be further specified using an Act valued with Value Set: MapRelationship (2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.11052). Semantic fidelity of the mapped IT Resource may also be indicated using a SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservation. -
MASKED
Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) by indicating the mechanism by which software systems can make data unintelligible (that is, as unreadable and unusable by algorithmically transforming plaintext into ciphertext) such that it can only be accessed or used by authorized users. An authorized user may be provided a key to decrypt per license or "shared secret". Usage Note: "MASKED" may be used, per applicable policy, as a flag to indicate to a user or receiver that some portion of an IT resource has been further encrypted, and may be accessed only by an authorized user or receiver to which a decryption key is provided. -
PSEUDED
Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability), by indicating the mechanism by which software systems can strip portions of the resource that could allow the identification of the source of the information or the information subject. Custodian may retain a key to relink data necessary to reidentify the information subject. Rationale: Personal data which has been processed to make it impossible to know whose data it is. Used particularly for secondary use of health data. In some cases, it may be possible for authorized individuals to restore the identity of the individual, e.g.,for public health case management. Based on ISO/TS 25237:2008 Health informaticsâ??Pseudonymization -
REDACTED
Security metadata observation value used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems can filter an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) to remove any portion of the resource that is not authorized to be access, used, or disclosed. Usage Note: "REDACTED" may be used, per applicable policy, as a flag to indicate to a user or receiver that some portion of an IT resource has filtered and not included in the content accessed or received. -
SUBSETTED
Metadata observation used to indicate that some information has been removed from the source object when the view this object contains was constructed because of configuration options when the view was created. The content may not be suitable for use as the basis of a record update Usage Note: This is not suitable to be used when information is removed for security reasons - see the code REDACTED for this use. -
SYNTAC
Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the IT resource syntax has been transformed from one syntactical representation to another. Usage Note: "SYNTAC" code does not indicate the syntactical correctness of the syntactically transformed IT resource. -
TRSLT
Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the IT resource has been translated from one human language to another. Usage Note: "TRSLT" does not indicate the fidelity of the translation or the languages translated. The fidelity of the IT Resource translation may be indicated using a SecurityIntegrityConfidenceObservation. To indicate languages, use the Value Set:HumanLanguage (2.16.840.1.113883.1.11.11526) -
VERSIONED
Security metadata observation value conveying the alteration integrity of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) which indicates that the resource only retains versions of an IT resource for access and use per applicable policy Usage Note: When this code is used, expectation is that the system has removed historical versions of the data that falls outside the time period deemed to be the effective time of the applicable version. -
_SECDATINTOBV
Abstract security observation values used to indicate data integrity metadata. Examples: Codes conveying the mechanism used to preserve the accuracy and consistency of an IT resource such as a digital signature and a cryptographic hash function. -
CRYTOHASH
Security metadata observation value used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems can establish that data was not modified in transit. Rationale: This definition is intended to align with the ISO 22600-2 3.3.19 definition of cryptographic checkvalue: Information which is derived by performing a cryptographic transformation (see cryptography) on the data unit. The derivation of the checkvalue may be performed in one or more steps and is a result of a mathematical function of the key and a data unit. It is usually used to check the integrity of a data unit. Examples: SHA-1 SHA-2 (Secure Hash Algorithm) -
DIGSIG
Security metadata observation value used to indicate the mechanism by which software systems use digital signature to establish that data has not been modified. Rationale: This definition is intended to align with the ISO 22600-2 3.3.26 definition of digital signature: Data appended to, or a cryptographic transformation (see cryptography) of, a data unit that allows a recipient of the data unit to prove the source and integrity of the data unit and protect against forgery e.g., by the recipient. -
_SECINTCONOBV
Abstract security observation value used to indicate integrity confidence metadata. Examples: Codes conveying the level of reliability and trustworthiness of an IT resource. -
HRELIABLE
Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be very high. -
RELIABLE
Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be adequate. -
UNCERTREL
Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be uncertain. -
UNRELIABLE
Security metadata observation value used to indicate that the veracity or trustworthiness of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) for a specified purpose of use is perceived to be or deemed by policy to be inadequate. -
_SECINTPRVOBV
Abstract security metadata observation value used to indicate the provenance of an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability). Examples: Codes conveying the provenance metadata about the entity reporting an IT resource. -
_SECINTPRVABOBV
Abstract security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate the entity that asserted an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability). Examples: Codes conveying the provenance metadata about the entity asserting the resource. -
CLINAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a clinician. -
DEVAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a device. -
HCPAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a healthcare professional. -
PACQAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a patient acquaintance. -
PATAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a patient. -
PAYAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a payer. -
PROAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a professional. -
SDMAST
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was asserted by a substitute decision maker. -
_SECINTPRVRBOBV
Abstract security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate the entity that reported the resource (data, information object, service, or system capability). Examples: Codes conveying the provenance metadata about the entity reporting an IT resource. -
CLINRPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a clinician. -
DEVRPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a device. -
HCPRPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a healthcare professional. -
PACQRPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a patient acquaintance. -
PATRPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a patient. -
PAYRPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a payer. -
PRORPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a professional. -
SDMRPT
Security provenance metadata observation value used to indicate that an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability) was reported by a substitute decision maker. -
SECTRSTOBV
Observation value used to indicate aspects of trust applicable to an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability). -
TRSTACCRDOBV
Values for security trust accreditation metadata observation made about the formal declaration by an authority or neutral third party that validates the technical, security, trust, and business practice conformance of Trust Agents to facilitate security, interoperability, and trust among participants within a security domain or trust framework. -
TRSTAGREOBV
Values for security trust agreement metadata observation made about privacy and security requirements with which a security domain must comply. [ISO IEC 10181-1] [ISO IEC 10181-1] -
TRSTCERTOBV
Values for security trust certificate metadata observation made about a set of security-relevant data issued by a security authority or trusted third party, together with security information which is used to provide the integrity and data origin authentication services for an IT resource (data, information object, service, or system capability). [Based on ISO IEC 10181-1] For example, a Certificate Policy (CP), which is a named set of rules that indicates the applicability of a certificate to a particular community and/or class of application with common security requirements. A particular Certificate Policy might indicate the applicability of a type of certificate to the authentication of electronic data interchange transactions for the trading of goods within a given price range. Another example is Cross Certification with Federal Bridge. -
TRSTLOAOBV
Values for security trust assurance metadata observation made about the digital quality or reliability of a trust assertion, activity, capability, information exchange, mechanism, process, or protocol. -
LOAAN
The value assigned as the indicator of the digital quality or reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator. [Based on ISO 7498-2] For example, the degree of confidence in the vetting process used to establish the identity of the individual to whom the credential was issued, and 2) the degree of confidence that the individual who uses the credential is the individual to whom the credential was issued. [OMB M-04-04 E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies] -
LOAAN1
Indicator of low digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator. [Based on ISO 7498-2] The degree of confidence in the vetting process used to establish the identity of the individual to whom the credential was issued, and 2) the degree of confidence that the individual who uses the credential is the individual to whom the credential was issued. [OMB M-04-04 E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies] Low authentication level of assurance indicates that the relying party may have little or no confidence in the asserted identity's validity. Level 1 requires little or no confidence in the asserted identity. No identity proofing is required at this level, but the authentication mechanism should provide some assurance that the same claimant is accessing the protected transaction or data. A wide range of available authentication technologies can be employed and any of the token methods of Levels 2, 3, or 4, including Personal Identification Numbers (PINs), may be used. To be authenticated, the claimant must prove control of the token through a secure authentication protocol. At Level 1, long-term shared authentication secrets may be revealed to verifiers. Assertions issued about claimants as a result of a successful authentication are either cryptographically authenticated by relying parties (using approved methods) or are obtained directly from a trusted party via a secure authentication protocol. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAN2
Indicator of basic digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator. [Based on ISO 7498-2] The degree of confidence in the vetting process used to establish the identity of the individual to whom the credential was issued, and 2) the degree of confidence that the individual who uses the credential is the individual to whom the credential was issued. [OMB M-04-04 E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies] Basic authentication level of assurance indicates that the relying party may have some confidence in the asserted identity's validity. Level 2 requires confidence that the asserted identity is accurate. Level 2 provides for single-factor remote network authentication, including identity-proofing requirements for presentation of identifying materials or information. A wide range of available authentication technologies can be employed, including any of the token methods of Levels 3 or 4, as well as passwords. Successful authentication requires that the claimant prove through a secure authentication protocol that the claimant controls the token. Eavesdropper, replay, and online guessing attacks are prevented. Long-term shared authentication secrets, if used, are never revealed to any party except the claimant and verifiers operated by the CSP; however, session (temporary) shared secrets may be provided to independent verifiers by the CSP. Approved cryptographic techniques are required. Assertions issued about claimants as a result of a successful authentication are either cryptographically authenticated by relying parties (using approved methods) or are obtained directly from a trusted party via a secure authentication protocol. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAN3
Indicator of medium digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of verification and validation of the process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator. [Based on ISO 7498-2] The degree of confidence in the vetting process used to establish the identity of the individual to whom the credential was issued, and 2) the degree of confidence that the individual who uses the credential is the individual to whom the credential was issued. [OMB M-04-04 E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies] Medium authentication level of assurance indicates that the relying party may have high confidence in the asserted identity's validity. Level 3 is appropriate for transactions that need high confidence in the accuracy of the asserted identity. Level 3 provides multifactor remote network authentication. At this level, identity-proofing procedures require verification of identifying materials and information. Authentication is based on proof of possession of a key or password through a cryptographic protocol. Cryptographic strength mechanisms should protect the primary authentication token (a cryptographic key) against compromise by the protocol threats, including eavesdropper, replay, online guessing, verifier impersonation, and man-in-the-middle attacks. A minimum of two authentication factors is required. Three kinds of tokens may be used: "soft" cryptographic token, which has the key stored on a general-purpose computer, "hard" cryptographic token, which has the key stored on a special hardware device, and "one-time password" device token, which has symmetric key stored on a personal hardware device that is a cryptographic module validated at FIPS 140-2 Level 1 or higher. Validation testing of cryptographic modules and algorithms for conformance to Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 140-2, Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules, is managed by NIST. Authentication requires that the claimant prove control of the token through a secure authentication protocol. The token must be unlocked with a password or biometric representation, or a password must be used in a secure authentication protocol, to establish two-factor authentication. Long-term shared authentication secrets, if used, are never revealed to any party except the claimant and verifiers operated directly by the CSP; however, session (temporary) shared secrets may be provided to independent verifiers by the CSP. Approved cryptographic techniques are used for all operations. Assertions issued about claimants as a result of a successful authentication are either cryptographically authenticated by relying parties (using approved methods) or are obtained directly from a trusted party via a secure authentication protocol. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAN4
Indicator of high digital quality or reliability of the digital reliability of the verification and validation process used to verify the claimed identity of an entity by securely associating an identifier and its authenticator. [Based on ISO 7498-2] The degree of confidence in the vetting process used to establish the identity of the individual to whom the credential was issued, and 2) the degree of confidence that the individual who uses the credential is the individual to whom the credential was issued. [OMB M-04-04 E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies] High authentication level of assurance indicates that the relying party may have very high confidence in the asserted identity's validity. Level 4 is for transactions that need very high confidence in the accuracy of the asserted identity. Level 4 provides the highest practical assurance of remote network authentication. Authentication is based on proof of possession of a key through a cryptographic protocol. This level is similar to Level 3 except that only â??hardâ?? cryptographic tokens are allowed, cryptographic module validation requirements are strengthened, and subsequent critical data transfers must be authenticated via a key that is bound to the authentication process. The token should be a hardware cryptographic module validated at FIPS 140-2 Level 2 or higher overall with at least FIPS 140-2 Level 3 physical security. This level requires a physical token, which cannot readily be copied, and operator authentication at Level 2 and higher, and ensures good, two-factor remote authentication. Level 4 requires strong cryptographic authentication of all parties and all sensitive data transfers between the parties. Either public key or symmetric key technology may be used. Authentication requires that the claimant prove through a secure authentication protocol that the claimant controls the token. Eavesdropper, replay, online guessing, verifier impersonation, and man-in-the-middle attacks are prevented. Long-term shared authentication secrets, if used, are never revealed to any party except the claimant and verifiers operated directly by the CSP; however, session (temporary) shared secrets may be provided to independent verifiers by the CSP. Strong approved cryptographic techniques are used for all operations. All sensitive data transfers are cryptographically authenticated using keys bound to the authentication process. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAP
The value assigned as the indicator of the digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] -
LOAAP1
Indicator of the low digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] Low authentication process level of assurance indicates that (1) long-term shared authentication secrets may be revealed to verifiers; and (2) assertions and assertion references require protection from manufacture/modification and reuse attacks. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAP2
Indicator of the basic digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] Basic authentication process level of assurance indicates that long-term shared authentication secrets are never revealed to any other party except Credential Service Provider (CSP). Sessions (temporary) shared secrets may be provided to independent verifiers by CSP. Long-term shared authentication secrets, if used, are never revealed to any other party except Verifiers operated by the Credential Service Provider (CSP); however, session (temporary) shared secrets may be provided to independent Verifiers by the CSP. In addition to Level 1 requirements, assertions are resistant to disclosure, redirection, capture and substitution attacks. Approved cryptographic techniques are required. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAP3
Indicator of the medium digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] Medium authentication process level of assurance indicates that the token can be unlocked with password, biometric, or uses a secure multi-token authentication protocol to establish two-factor authentication. Long-term shared authentication secrets are never revealed to any party except the Claimant and Credential Service Provider (CSP). Authentication requires that the Claimant prove, through a secure authentication protocol, that he or she controls the token. The Claimant unlocks the token with a password or biometric, or uses a secure multi-token authentication protocol to establish two-factor authentication (through proof of possession of a physical or software token in combination with some memorized secret knowledge). Long-term shared authentication secrets, if used, are never revealed to any party except the Claimant and Verifiers operated directly by the CSP; however, session (temporary) shared secrets may be provided to independent Verifiers by the CSP. In addition to Level 2 requirements, assertions are protected against repudiation by the Verifier. -
LOAAP4
Indicator of the high digital quality or reliability of a defined sequence of messages between a Claimant and a Verifier that demonstrates that the Claimant has possession and control of a valid token to establish his/her identity, and optionally, demonstrates to the Claimant that he or she is communicating with the intended Verifier. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] High authentication process level of assurance indicates all sensitive data transfer are cryptographically authenticated using keys bound to the authentication process. Level 4 requires strong cryptographic authentication of all communicating parties and all sensitive data transfers between the parties. Either public key or symmetric key technology may be used. Authentication requires that the Claimant prove through a secure authentication protocol that he or she controls the token. All protocol threats at Level 3 are required to be prevented at Level 4. Protocols shall also be strongly resistant to man-in-the-middle attacks. Long-term shared authentication secrets, if used, are never revealed to any party except the Claimant and Verifiers operated directly by the CSP; however, session (temporary) shared secrets may be provided to independent Verifiers by the CSP. Approved cryptographic techniques are used for all operations. All sensitive data transfers are cryptographically authenticated using keys bound to the authentication process. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAS
The value assigned as the indicator of the high quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber. Assertions may also contain verified attributes. -
LOAAS1
Indicator of the low quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber. Assertions may also contain verified attributes. Assertions and assertion references require protection from modification and reuse attacks. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAS2
Indicator of the basic quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber. Assertions may also contain verified attributes. Assertions are resistant to disclosure, redirection, capture and substitution attacks. Approved cryptographic techniques are required for all assertion protocols. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAS3
Indicator of the medium quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber. Assertions may also contain verified attributes. Assertions are protected against repudiation by the verifier. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOAAS4
Indicator of the high quality or reliability of the statement from a Verifier to a Relying Party (RP) that contains identity information about a Subscriber. Assertions may also contain verified attributes. Strongly resistant to man-in-the-middle attacks. "Bearer" assertions are not used. "Holder-of-key" assertions may be used. RP maintains records of the assertions. [Summary of the technical requirements specified in NIST SP 800-63 for the four levels of assurance defined by the December 2003, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued Memorandum M-04-04, E-Authentication Guidance for Federal Agencies.] -
LOACM
Indicator of the digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and its binding to an identity. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOACM1
Indicator of the low digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and its binding to an identity. Little or no confidence that an individual has maintained control over a token that has been entrusted to him or her and that that token has not been compromised. Characteristics include weak identity binding to tokens and plaintext passwords or secrets not transmitted across a network. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOACM2
Indicator of the basic digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and its binding to an identity. Some confidence that an individual has maintained control over a token that has been entrusted to him or her and that that token has not been compromised. Characteristics include: Verification must prove claimant controls the token; token resists online guessing, replay, session hijacking, and eavesdropping attacks; and token is at least weakly resistant to man-in-the middle attacks. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOACM3
Indicator of the medium digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and itâ??s binding to an identity. High confidence that an individual has maintained control over a token that has been entrusted to him or her and that that token has not been compromised. Characteristics include: Ownership of token verifiable through security authentication protocol and credential management protects against verifier impersonation attacks. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOACM4
Indicator of the high digital quality or reliability of the activities performed by the Credential Service Provider (CSP) subsequent to electronic authentication registration, identity proofing and issuance activities to manage and safeguard the integrity of an issued credential and itâ??s binding to an identity. Very high confidence that an individual has maintained control over a token that has been entrusted to him or her and that that token has not been compromised. Characteristics include: Verifier can prove control of token through a secure protocol; credential management supports strong cryptographic authentication of all communication parties. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOAID
Indicator of the quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be. -
LOAID1
Indicator of low digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be. Requires that a continuity of identity be maintained but does not require identity proofing. [Based on Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOAID2
Indicator of some digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that that an individual is who he or she claims to be. Requires identity proofing via presentation of identifying material or information. [Based on Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOAID3
Indicator of high digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be. Requires identity proofing procedures for verification of identifying materials and information. [Based on Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOAID4
Indicator of high digital quality or reliability in the process of ascertaining that an individual is who he or she claims to be. Requires identity proofing procedures for verification of identifying materials and information. [Based on Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOANR
Indicator of the digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin. [Based on ISO 7498-2] -
LOANR1
Indicator of low digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin. [Based on ISO 7498-2] -
LOANR2
Indicator of basic digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin. [Based on ISO 7498-2] -
LOANR3
Indicator of medium digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin. [Based on ISO 7498-2] -
LOANR4
Indicator of high digital quality or reliability in the process of establishing proof of delivery and proof of origin. [Based on ISO 7498-2] -
LOARA
Indicator of the digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] -
LOARA1
Indicator of low digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] -
LOARA2
Indicator of basic digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] -
LOARA3
Indicator of medium digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organizationâ??s security controls. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] -
LOARA4
Indicator of high digital quality or reliability of the information exchange between network-connected devices where the information cannot be reliably protected end-to-end by a single organization's security controls. [Based on NIST SP 800-63-2] -
LOATK
Indicator of the digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOATK1
Indicator of the low digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication. Permits the use of any of the token methods of Levels 2, 3, or 4. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOATK2
Indicator of the basic digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication. Requires single factor authentication using memorized secret tokens, pre-registered knowledge tokens, look-up secret tokens, out of band tokens, or single factor one-time password devices. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOATK3
Indicator of the medium digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication. Requires two authentication factors. Provides multi-factor remote network authentication. Permits multi-factor software cryptographic token. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
LOATK4
Indicator of the high digital quality or reliability of single and multi-token authentication. Requires token that is a hardware cryptographic module validated at validated at Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 140-2 Level 2 or higher overall with at least FIPS 140-2 Level 3 physical security. Level 4 token requirements can be met by using the PIV authentication key of a FIPS 201 compliant Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Card. [Electronic Authentication Guideline - Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 800-63-1, Dec 2011] -
TRSTMECOBV
Values for security trust mechanism metadata observation made about a security architecture system component that supports enforcement of security policies. -
_SEVERITYOBSERVATION
Potential values for observations of severity. -
H
Indicates the condition may be life-threatening or has the potential to cause permanent injury. -
L
Indicates the condition may result in some adverse consequences but is unlikely to substantially affect the situation of the subject. -
M
Indicates the condition may result in noticable adverse adverse consequences but is unlikely to be life-threatening or cause permanent injury. -
_SUBJECTBODYPOSITION
Contains codes for defining the observed, physical position of a subject, such as during an observation, assessment, collection of a specimen, etc. ECG waveforms and vital signs, such as blood pressure, are two examples where a general, observed position typically needs to be noted. -
LLD
Lying on the left side. -
PRN
Lying with the front or ventral surface downward; lying face down. -
RLD
Lying on the right side. -
SFWL
A semi-sitting position in bed with the head of the bed elevated approximately 45 degrees. -
SIT
Resting the body on the buttocks, typically with upper torso erect or semi erect. -
STN
To be stationary, upright, vertical, on one's legs. -
SUP
supine -
RTRD
Lying on the back, on an inclined plane, typically about 30-45 degrees with head raised and feet lowered. -
TRD
Lying on the back, on an inclined plane, typically about 30-45 degrees, with head lowered and feet raised. -
_VERIFICATIONOUTCOMEVALUE
Values for observations of verification act results Examples: Verified, not verified, verified with warning. -
ACT
Definition: Coverage is in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s). -
ACTPEND
Definition: Coverage is in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s) - Pending Investigation -
ELG
Definition: Coverage is in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s). -
INACT
Definition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s). -
INPNDINV
Definition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s) - Pending Investigation. -
INPNDUPD
Definition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s) - Pending Eligibility Update. -
NELG
Definition: Coverage is not in effect for healthcare service(s) and/or product(s). May optionally include reasons for the ineligibility. -
_ANNOTATIONVALUE
AnnotationValue -
_COMMONCLINICALOBSERVATIONVALUE
Description:Used in a patient care message to value simple clinical (non-lab) observations. -
_INDIVIDUALCASESAFETYREPORTVALUEDOMAINS
This domain is established as a parent to a variety of value domains being defined to support the communication of Individual Case Safety Reports to regulatory bodies. Arguably, this aggregation is not taxonomically pure, but the grouping will facilitate the management of these domains. -
_INDICATIONVALUE
Indicates the specific observation result which is the reason for the action (prescription, lab test, etc.). E.g. Headache, Ear infection, planned diagnostic image (requiring contrast agent), etc. -
NULL
added to help the parsers
-
-
Method Details
-
values
Returns an array containing the constants of this enum type, in the order they are declared.- Returns:
- an array containing the constants of this enum type, in the order they are declared
-
valueOf
Returns the enum constant of this type with the specified name. The string must match exactly an identifier used to declare an enum constant in this type. (Extraneous whitespace characters are not permitted.)- Parameters:
name- the name of the enum constant to be returned.- Returns:
- the enum constant with the specified name
- Throws:
IllegalArgumentException- if this enum type has no constant with the specified nameNullPointerException- if the argument is null
-
fromCode
public static V3ObservationValue fromCode(String codeString) throws org.hl7.fhir.exceptions.FHIRException - Throws:
org.hl7.fhir.exceptions.FHIRException
-
toCode
-
getSystem
-
getDefinition
-
getDisplay
-